California Solar Guide 2026

NEM 3.0 changed the game for California solar. Here's what you need to know about costs, incentives, and whether solar still makes sense in the Golden State.

Quick Answer
California solar economics changed with NEM 3.0 (April 2023)—export credits dropped 75-80%. Battery is now almost essential for optimal value. A 7 kW system costs $19,600-$22,400 (add $12,000-$14,000 for battery). SGIP provides $150-$200/kWh rebate. With rates at $0.35-$0.55/kWh and rising 6-8% annually, payback is 6-9 years. Self-consumption is the new strategy.

California Solar Overview

💡
From my experience:

California's NEM 3.0 changed everything. I have had to completely rethink the advice I give to CA homeowners. Pre-April 2023, solar-only systems were a slam dunk. Now? Batteries are not optional—they are essential if you want to maximize your investment. The economics still work, but you need to be strategic. I have spent a lot of time studying these new rates, and the key is self-consumption, not exports.

California has more residential solar than any other state—and for good reason. Despite recent policy changes, the combination of high electricity rates, abundant sunshine, and state incentives makes solar a strong investment for most California homeowners.

[Editor's Note, Jan 2026]:NEM 3.0 export rates vary by utility and time of day. PG&E, SCE, and SDG&E each have different rate structures. SGIP battery rebate funding comes in waves—check current availability with your installer.
California Quick Facts
Average Cost: $2.80-$3.20 per watt ($19,600-$22,400 for 7 kW system) — EnergySage, Q4 2025
Payback Period: 6-9 years
Net Metering: NEM 3.0 (reduced export rates) — CPUC Decision 22-12-056
Key Incentive: SGIP battery rebate ($150-$200/kWh) — CPUC SGIP Program

NEM 3.0 Explained

California's Net Energy Metering 3.0 (NEM 3.0) took effect April 15, 2023, and significantly changed solar economics. Here's what you need to know:

What Changed

FactorNEM 2.0 (Old)NEM 3.0 (Current)
Export Credit~$0.30/kWh (full retail)~$0.05-$0.08/kWh (varies by time)
Credit ReductionNone75-80% lower than retail
Best StrategyMaximize exportsMaximize self-consumption
Battery ValueOptionalHighly recommended

How NEM 3.0 Works

Under NEM 3.0, the credit you receive for exported solar depends on the time of day and the "avoided cost" to the utility. Exports during peak evening hours (4-9 PM) are worth more than midday exports when solar is abundant.

  • Midday exports: ~$0.04-$0.06/kWh
  • Peak exports (4-9 PM): ~$0.08-$0.12/kWh
  • Weekend/off-peak: ~$0.03-$0.05/kWh
NEM 3.0 Strategy
With NEM 3.0, the goal is to use your own solar directly rather than exporting. A battery lets you store midday solar and use it in the evening when electricity is expensive ($0.40-$0.60/kWh from the grid). This is why batteries are now almost essential in California. (Source: utility tariff filings and DSIRE Database)

California Solar Costs

California solar costs are slightly above the national average due to higher labor rates and permitting requirements, but the payback is still excellent thanks to sky-high electricity rates.

System SizeGross CostWith Battery
5 kW$14,000-$16,000$26,000-$30,000
7 kW$19,600-$22,400$31,600-$36,400
10 kW$28,000-$32,000$40,000-$46,000

Battery adds approximately $12,000-$14,000 for one Tesla Powerwall or equivalent.

California Solar Incentives

Federal Tax Credit

  • Cash/Loan Purchase: No federal credit (25D expired Dec 2025)
  • PPA/Lease: 30% credit claimed by solar company (savings passed to you)

State Incentives

  • SGIP Battery Rebate: $150-$200/kWh (see below)
  • Property Tax Exclusion: Solar doesn't increase property taxes
  • Sales Tax Exemption: No sales tax on solar equipment
  • CARE/FERA Discounts: Low-income programs with higher incentives

SGIP Battery Rebate

The Self-Generation Incentive Program (SGIP) provides rebates for solar batteries. This is one of the best battery incentives in the country.

SGIP Rebate Amounts

CategoryRebate per kWhTesla Powerwall (13.5 kWh)
Standard Residential$150/kWh~$2,000
Equity (low-income)$850/kWh~$11,500
Equity Resiliency (high fire risk + low-income)$1,000/kWh~$13,500

SGIP funding comes in waves and can run out quickly. Check with your installer about current availability.

Is Solar Worth It in California?

Yes, but the strategy has changed. Here's the honest assessment:

Solar is Still Worth It Because:

  • California electricity rates are among the highest in the nation ($0.35-$0.55/kWh) — EIA, 2025
  • Rates are increasing 6-8% per year (locked in savings) — CPUC rate case filings
  • Self-consumption still saves full retail value
  • Battery + solar maximizes value under NEM 3.0
  • Property tax exemption protects home value

But You Should Know:

  • NEM 3.0 reduced ROI compared to NEM 2.0 (was 5-6 years, now 7-9 years)
  • Battery is almost essential to maximize value
  • System design matters more—size for self-consumption, not export
  • PPA/Lease may be more attractive now (includes 30% federal credit)
Recommendation
If you're going solar in California in 2026, strongly consider adding a battery. Under NEM 3.0, a solar+battery system has better economics than solar alone. Get quotes for both options and compare the 25-year savings. (Source: utility tariff filings and DSIRE Database)

Utility-Specific Information

PG&E (Pacific Gas & Electric)

  • Covers Northern and Central California
  • TOU rates with expensive peak (4-9 PM)
  • NEM 3.0 applies
  • Known for slow interconnection (plan for 4-6 week wait)

SCE (Southern California Edison)

  • Covers most of Southern California
  • Similar TOU structure to PG&E
  • NEM 3.0 applies
  • Generally faster interconnection than PG&E

SDG&E (San Diego Gas & Electric)

  • Covers San Diego area
  • Highest rates in California
  • NEM 3.0 applies
  • Solar ROI often fastest in SDG&E territory

Questions About California Solar?

Our AI knows the details of NEM 3.0, SGIP, and California-specific solar economics. Get personalized answers.

Ask About CA Solar
LP

Written by

Lincoln Panasy

Founder, SolarQuest AI • Solar Expert Since 2018

Lincoln created SolarQuest AI after seeing too many homeowners get burned by pushy solar salespeople. With 8 years of experience in the solar industry since 2018, he writes and reviews all content on this site—combining his real-world expertise with AI tools to deliver accurate, unbiased solar education.